Connect with us

Politics

Singapore’s Lee Hsien Loong Critiques US Military Actions in Venezuela

Editorial

Published

on

Singapore’s Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong expressed serious concerns regarding the United States’ recent military actions in Venezuela, emphasizing their implications for international law and the global order. Speaking at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute’s Regional Outlook Forum on January 8, 2026, Lee stated that such unilateral interventions undermine the principles outlined in the United Nations Charter.

On January 3, the US military operation resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. Maduro, who faces multiple charges including narco-terrorism, has pleaded not guilty in a New York federal court. While Lee acknowledged the complex situation in Venezuela, he firmly opposed military intervention without proper international authorization, stating, “that does not justify military intervention by one country into another.”

International Law and Its Implications

Lee stressed that the consequences of the US intervention extend beyond immediate military success. He noted that while short-term results might appear favorable, the long-term ramifications for the international system are concerning. “If that is the way the world works, we have a problem,” he remarked, highlighting the potential for destabilization.

Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterated its commitment to upholding international law, underscoring the importance of state sovereignty and territorial integrity. On January 4, the ministry emphasized that it consistently opposes actions that contravene international law, including military interventions. Lee pointed out that Singapore has previously taken a stand on similar issues, notably supporting a UN resolution condemning Russian aggression against Ukraine in March 2022 and opposing the US invasion of Grenada in 1983.

Shifts in Global Strategy

During his dialogue with Professor Chan Heng Chee, chairperson of the ISEAS board, Lee outlined significant shifts in global strategies over the past year. He indicated that the US has become increasingly willing to act unilaterally when its national interests are at stake. Specific examples include military actions in the Middle East, Nigeria, and more recently, Venezuela.

Lee acknowledged that while these actions may yield immediate results, they pose risks to the broader international framework based on cooperation and coexistence. He warned, “Going to war has grievous and very unpredictable consequences.”

As European nations grapple with their security policies in light of a changing global landscape, Lee noted that they are seeking greater autonomy from US influence. He highlighted that Ukraine, currently engaged in conflict with Russia, must navigate its path forward in this new context.

Looking ahead, Lee remarked that countries in the Asia-Pacific region are also reevaluating their positions. While the US remains a crucial ally in security and economics, China’s growing influence cannot be overlooked. He expressed hope that China would commit to multilateralism and a rules-based international system as it engages with its neighbors.

As the geopolitical landscape evolves, Singapore remains vigilant, aiming to uphold the values of international law and cooperation. Lee underscored the need for stability, stating, “We hope we don’t have any tectonic shocks again,” and emphasized the unpredictable nature of global events ahead.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.